From fda0fd6c5b722cc48e904e0daafedca275d332af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 16:38:49 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] [DCCP]: Use skb_set_owner_w in dccp_transmit_skb when skb->sk is NULL David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: > One thing you can probably do for this bug is to mark data packets > explicitly somehow, perhaps in the SKB control block DCCP already > uses for other data. Put some boolean in there, set it true for > data packets. Then change the test in dccp_transmit_skb() as > appropriate to test the boolean flag instead of "skb_cloned(skb)". I agree. In fact we already have that flag, it's called skb->sk. So here is patch to test that instead of skb_cloned(). Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Acked-by: Ian McDonald <imcdnzl@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> --- net/dccp/output.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/dccp/output.c b/net/dccp/output.c index 4786bdcddcc92..946ec2db75de7 100644 --- a/net/dccp/output.c +++ b/net/dccp/output.c @@ -62,10 +62,8 @@ int dccp_transmit_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) skb->h.raw = skb_push(skb, dccp_header_size); dh = dccp_hdr(skb); - /* - * Data packets are not cloned as they are never retransmitted - */ - if (skb_cloned(skb)) + + if (!skb->sk) skb_set_owner_w(skb, sk); /* Build DCCP header and checksum it. */ -- 2.30.2